A once and for all breakdown of which Dream Team is the superior squad

Written by  //  July 13, 2012  //  Feature, NBA  //  8 Comments

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

Center: This year’s edition has been called undersized so if we start with the true centers, Tyson Chandler has nothing for either Patrick Ewing or David Robinson.

Chandler would be competitive and in the way that the game has changed over-the-years he could be very effective in terms of setting up the forwards to get inside, but stroke for stroke he would be defeated consistently by either choice.

Anthony Davis is a hybrid and while time could easily prove otherwise as of right now his inexperience would be his downfall working against either Ewing or Robinson. However…

Forward: When Davis is working the forward slot, he would wear Christian Laettner out. At the time of his selection Laettner was a collegiate athlete just like Davis sort of is. Lattener’s lack of mental toughness plagued his entire career and while he would not go to the rim, Davis would.

Laettner would get beaten so bad by Davis that Jordon would kick him off the court out of frustration.

At this stage of his career Larry Bird was plagued by back issues and retired less than 60 days after his Olympic experience.

If we are dealing with the reality of where he was then and not how he played during the largest portion of his epic career, we cannot with a straight face say that he could take Carmelo Anthony, Kevin Durant, LeBron James, Kevin Love, Anthony Davis or Andre Iguodala.

We can in all sincerity state that Bird’s savvy play and will to win would allow him to make a play here and there. But that is the best that he could do.

Scottie Pippen is the most competitive forward on the 92 team because at 27 he was balling-out-of control.

The small forward could have easily taken Iguodala and Love. He goes step-for-step with Anthony and he would definitely succumb to both Durant and James because quite frankly he never individually played at their level.

Let the controversy begin on that statement but as a forward when you have Michael Jordon to lean on, your life is a lot easier than it would be on other teams. Pippen is one-of-the-best-that-ever-did-it but where he was then and where they are now equals defeat for Pippen.

James may have talent around him now but we can’t toss out the Cleveland years when he willed them to the post-season by himself.

If this was even two years ago, I would give Pippen the nod over James thanks to this being the biggest of the big moments, but James has arrived both mentally and physically to accept any challenges.

As for Durant, his 6’9 frame would set his shots up every time against Pippen’s 6’7. Going inside Pippen physically again would have a hard time and like Durant is prone to saying he would just be “too small.”

Power was Karl Malone’s calling card and he would throw down on every single one of these guys save James. Malone would give the 92 squad a strong presence but with James being a minute’s hog, he would meet his match on more than one occasion.

Chris Mullen more or less equals the Iguodala of the group as the really good forward amongst a group of incredible ones.

So head up against Iggy, it would be close but Andre has a lot more pure power than Mullins did and that would see him through when they met.

Now Charles Barkley had no problem with contact. But in reality he’d fight with Kevin Love over height surrendering four inches.

When Sir Charles checked out of games it was usually due to guys that enveloped him.  So Love presents perhaps his biggest challenge.

It seems odd right when Love would probably be defeated by Malone and Pippen but that’s really how matchups work.

Based on pure style Anthony gives him fits and could take him on frustration but in the end Barkley could snuff him out along with Iggy and maybe even Durant or James if he was “on” and he got inside their respective heads.

I don’t think Barkley could outplay Durant or James for more than one game and he would probably split the difference with Melo.

Guards: Let’s go ahead and roll straight into Jordan vs. Kobe. The reason that Kobe could never, ever, ever see Michael Jordan has nothing to do with talent. It has everything to do with will.

Kobe is prideful and yes the most competitive man currently playing in the NBA. But what made Jordan…Jordan is a competitive nature unlike any other.

Kobe would be willing to play until he fainted to take Jordan. Jordan would be willing to die to win each one of these games.

That would be the difference between the two every single time they got on the court.

You don’t even need to break down any other matchup with either of them because they would demand to face each other for every moment of every contest.

If the guard position is the quarterback slot of this game, Russell Westbrook suffers from the same disease that Mike Vick used to have in Atlanta. He wants to do everything with the ball all of the time.

That can work in today’s NBA. But against most of these guys? He would get eaten alive because they would sit back and toy with the youngster as he wore himself out.

Again we have to emphasize that at this time, Magic Johnson had knee problems that would not go away.

He didn’t even play a whole lot during the 92 games and if we are being totally honest with each other, did more to educate people on HIV than he could do on the court.

So the 92 Magic Johnson could not have defeated Deron Williams, Chris Paul, Russell Westbrook or James Harden in a head-to-head matchup. There is always love for Magic in my heart but this would not go down the way many people with selective memory think that it would.

John Stockton vs. Chris Paul or Deron Williams are the fights that would swing this thing one way or the other in most games. Paul’s style is the closest to Stockton’s.

Stockton had instant chemistry with his NBA teammate Malone that would help against Williams and Paul.

Stockton against the sixth man Harden is interesting because Harden does play an old school style and he has 60% of the same chemistry with Durant that Stockton shares with Malone.

Drexler would get be defeated by Williams and Paul while taking Westbrook and Harden.

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

Pages: 1 2 3

About the Author

Adrian Glover is Players View's Editor-In-Chief. He has spent his days as a newspaper columnist,magazine editor, freelance writer and as somebody's father. Follow him on Twitter at @playersview. Email him:adriangregoryglover@gmail.com

View all posts by

  • Breyzh

    How the heck do you manage to screw up every single one of your articles ?
    That is NOT how basketball works. Matchups are important, but the best players matchups are much more important, and it isn’t the only thing that counts (see : team defense)

    Who gives a flying poo about Laettner ? The guy barely played, and with good reason : there were Malone, Barkley, Pippen, Bird and Mullin all playing more minutes than him at forward !

    You’re saying we have to forget any agenda, but you obviously didn’t : insisting heavily on Laettner while he would be a total non-factor is really dishonnest, as is arguing that Chandler, Davis or Love would even give a run for their money to either DRob or Ewing. Same goes for Love vs Barkley or anyone on the 2012 team trying to guard Malone consistently (yup, even James). Same with Pippen : he wouldn’t be as bothered by Durant’s lenght as you seem to think, since he had freakishly long arms and could guard some 4.

    The age argument is invalid aswell, as there were no youngsters except Laettner (in the vein of Harden, Davis, Westbrook) to trim down the average age of the 92 team. Bird and Magic were old already (they are the 2 who make the 92 team older), but they didn’t have that significant of a role anyway : the roster was spear-headed by Barkley, Jordan, Pippen and Malone. I think it’s you who has selective memory.

    I won’t argue point by point because, hey, I’m not a blogger, but you shouldn’t be either.

    Do you even proof-read ? There’s a typo in the 1st word of the article for the love of god !

    I won’t even get into the argument of which team is better (the 92 team has better bigs, better shooting, better passing, while the 2012 team is quicker and more athletic), I’m just pointing out the obvious holes in your arguments.

  • Breyzh

    Oh, I’ll also be shocked if the 2012 team gets 11 of its players in the HoF… Chandler and Iggy won’t make it, and Davis, Harden, Love and Westbrook are far from shoe-ins at this point in their career (because they are still not in their prime, which was the case of 9 of the 12 players (save for Magic, Bird and Laettner) on the 92 roster). I’m not even sure ‘Melo will make it tbh.

    That means the 2012 team has 4 (future) HoFers in their prime (James, Paul, Durant and Williams) against 9 for the 2012 team. Even if you consider Kobe to be in his prime or ‘Melo as a sure-fire HoFer, there’s still a clear advantage to the 92 team.

    You could argue that with the better training nowadays would helép the 2012 team, but you didnt…

  • Adam

    I definitly thought you wee idding once you started bringing up christian laetner. Then I kept reading and realized you were serious and just started to laugh. You must be about 17 years old and clearly not have ever seen any of the 92 team with your own eyes because if you did you would know how silly you sound.

  • Ian

    You failed to analyze the most important element of great teams- passing. Literally every player on the dream team was a great passer. That compared to about a third of today’s team. Dream team would slIce them up my man.

  • TK

    If you look at matchs up as a whole you will see where your argument is way off. C-Robinson, Ewing over Chandler, Davis…all day. PF-Malone, Barkley over Griffin(healthy), Love. SF-Pippen,Mullin ok its close but lets go Lebron,Iggy. SG-Jordan,Drexler over Kobe, Anthony. PG-Stockon,Magic tie Westbrook, Paul. Yes I left out Bird, and Latner, as they were non factors, and Harden. Fact is they wouldn’t go 10-12 deep. They wouldn’t need to. The most important part is being missed, mental toughness and will to win. Yes 2012 is young and athletic but the 19992 is far from over the hill. How would you want taking a last shot? Anyone on the ’12 team over Jordan, Magic? Doubt it. Also, each position wouldn’t get equal minutes, or touches. If I take my starting 5 of Stockon, Jordan, Pippen, Malone, Ewing. You have two sets of players who knew each other inside and out. Add my bench of Magic,Drexler,Mullins,Barkley,Robinson (all in their prime minus Magic) vs. Your starting 5 of Paul,Kobe,Durant,Lebron,Chandler you are playing offense 4 vs. 5. Then bench of Williams,Westbrook,Anthony,Love,Davis…I will give the willy old vets the edge…starters and bench. Yes I will give you that 11th and 12th man of Harden and Iggy would get the best of Bird(at his age) and Lattner, but truth is they would never see the floor in a game, in a series, unless it was a blow out. I could go on and on analysing but here is the bottom line, you surround the G.O.A.T. (MJ) with 10 H.O.F’s and you don’t lose. Period.

  • Jimmy James

    This is quite possibly the worst “analysis” I’ve ever read. There is just so much baseless assumption, logically flawed points and lack of understanding of how basketball is played, I’d be embarrassed to put my name on this. This kind of work isn’t going to cut it anywhere.

  • KP

    This is laughable. 92 would dump the ball inside to Ewing and force 12 to double-team the post allowing 92 to PASS the basketball to get easy shots… Did you think of any of scenario like this before you wrote? You must have been too intrigued by who would abuse Christian Laettner in the 2 minutes of garbage time he would be on the floor. Of course that would be when 92 was up by 20 in the 4th because they could play team basketball, too, instead of just one on one basketball.

  • http://www.playersview.net Hurricane-PV

    Thank you all for your comments. As expected, this analysis and its eventual outcome did spark passionate results.

    We have immortalized the 92 squad so much that they are now placed on a pedestal that renders them unbeatable.

    The match-ups are they key but that is my take on it.

    For those that question my abilities as a writer, please keep in mind I have made a living in this profession for two decades at various newspapers, magazines and digital publications.

    With that being said, I appreciate everybody’s opinion on this topic.That’s what we do best as sports people…debate.

%d bloggers like this: